Tutorial � Carmel Houston-Price L&C VI � animal language

Greg Detre

15/11/00

 

external rater rated the movements of the animal

Kanzi listening to a blind researcher on headphones

we have to judge him on his comprehension not production

harder to be objective about his productions

Kanzi � most exciting + controlled of the experiments

 

to an observer, human language might seem to be a bit random/ant-like

 

what is it that we don't want animal to have about language

HOT + self-consciousness, spontaneous comments

thoughts as emergent properties of language, but human language

want to prove that apes don't have the generative aspects of syntax and language by showing that they can't master English

we aren't examining purely the linguistic aspects of an ape, but really the human-language-learning ability

 

Kanzi�s keyboard is not his first language, spoken is

and vice versa for language

but Kanzi is like a dumb child (severely impaired) since he cannot produce spoken responses

Alea�s vocalisations were scored

 

what about Kanzi syntax in 3-word occurrences?

 

example errors

neither could distinguish in/on

Kanzi couldn't distinguish �paint� + �clay�

ball on � same chance as � on ball � couldn't seem to use syntax to determine exact meaning � both Kanzi + alex

Kanzi ate one of the stimuli, Alea did this 4 times

sometimes either of them played with an item or refused to

�water on the carrot� � threw it outside in the rain

Alea was poorer are moving around on her own (confidence?)

memory limits your contextual your contextual scientif.(???)

 

Kanzi definitely seems to understand, but he can't really grasp syntax, I don�t think

Simon Berg - criticisms

 

Questions

compare Kanzi with a dumb child??? deprived of the ability to rehearse

and even if you gave Kanzi a speaking keyboard, so he could sort of respond with speech, he�d lose any cues you get from using different intonation (and watching people�s responses to your tones), and especially if the motor theory of speech perception is true

how different could language be??? are even the key linguistic universals too anthropocentric???

almost certainly, surely!

Kanzi pretty much definitely can't produce syntax � but can he appreciate understand differences in syntax???